The short answer
A holding statement is a brief, factual release — a few sentences — issued within the first hour of a crisis to acknowledge the situation, confirm you are responding, and set a time for your next update. It buys you time to gather facts without ceding the narrative to speculation.
When a crisis breaks, the first hour decides who tells your story. Reporters are filing, social media is filling the vacuum, and your silence reads as evasion. A holding statement is not a press release, an apology, or a full account of what happened. It is a placeholder — factual, controlled, and deliberately narrow — that tells the public you know something is happening and you are handling it.
Get this document approved before you need it. The time to argue over word choices is not when an incident is unfolding.
Template
First-Hour Holding Statement Template
Copy this template and pre-fill the bracketed fields during your planning phase — not during an incident. Have your approved spokesperson, incident commander, and communications lead review it before you ever need it.
[ORGANIZATION NAME] HOLDING STATEMENT Date: [DATE] | Time Issued: [TIME] | Contact: [PIO NAME, PHONE, EMAIL] --- [ORGANIZATION NAME] is aware of [brief, factual description of the incident — one phrase, no speculation, e.g., "a fire at our [LOCATION] facility" or "an employee injury at our [LOCATION] worksite"] that occurred at approximately [TIME] on [DATE]. We are actively responding. [ONE sentence describing the immediate action underway — e.g., "Our team is on scene working alongside [AGENCY NAME] to address the situation and ensure the safety of those involved."] At this time, we are working to gather additional information and cannot confirm [specific details — e.g., the cause of the incident / the extent of injuries / the scope of impact]. We will not speculate. We will provide a full update at [SPECIFIC TIME, e.g., 3:00 PM Eastern] or sooner if circumstances change. Media inquiries should be directed to [PIO NAME] at [PHONE / EMAIL]. --- INTERNAL USE — APPROVAL CHECKLIST BEFORE RELEASE: [ ] Reviewed by Incident Commander or authorized executive [ ] All factual claims verified against known information [ ] No cause, blame, injury estimates, or apologies included [ ] Next update time confirmed and calendared [ ] Distribution list confirmed (media contacts, internal stakeholders, social channels) [ ] Spokesperson briefed on this statement and prepared for follow-up questions
What goes into a holding statement?
A holding statement contains four elements: an acknowledgment of the incident, the confirmed facts only, the action your organization is taking right now, and a commitment to a specific next update time. Anything beyond those four elements is either speculation or information you cannot yet verify — and both will hurt you.
Keep the statement to three to five sentences. Brevity signals confidence; a long first statement signals that someone is improvising.
What should you leave out?
Leave out cause, blame, estimates of damage or injury, and apologies. Not because you are being evasive, but because those statements require facts you almost certainly do not have in the first hour. The FEMA National Incident Management System doctrine is explicit that public information releases must be approved by the Incident Commander or Unified Command before release — that approval chain exists precisely to prevent unverified claims from going out under your name.
Never speculate. Never estimate. If you do not know, say you are working to confirm.
Who approves the statement before it goes out?
The Public Information Officer drafts; the Incident Commander or authorized executive approves. Under NIMS, the PIO sits on the Command Staff and gathers, verifies, coordinates and releases incident information, but the Incident Commander or Unified Command approves every release. If your organization is part of a multi-agency response, the Joint Information System structure coordinates releases so no single agency contradicts another.
If you do not have a designated PIO, designate one before you need one. An untrained spokesperson making ad hoc statements is a liability, not an asset.
How fast does the first statement actually need to go out?
We recommend getting the first statement out within the first hour of the incident becoming public or reaching your command staff — whichever comes first. If media is already on scene or the story is circulating on social platforms, your window is shorter. Your holding statement does not need to be comprehensive; it needs to be first.
Speed is a skill you build before an incident: approve the template now and drill it in your exercises, because timing is a tactical variable, not a courtesy.
How do you set up the next update cycle?
The closing line of every holding statement must name a specific time for the next update — not "as soon as possible" and not "later today." Specific times anchor expectations and reduce the volume of incoming media calls. If you say you will have an update at a named time, honor it even if the update is only to say that your investigation is ongoing.
This cycle — holding statement, scheduled update, substantive briefing — is the backbone of disciplined first-hour crisis communications. Each release should be approved through the same chain as the first.
What if your organization has no crisis plan yet?
Then you are operating reactively in the most consequential communication window your organization will face. A holding statement template is a starting point, not a crisis plan. A functional plan defines your spokesperson, your approval chain, your media contact list, and your escalation thresholds before any of those decisions need to be made under pressure.
In our experience, organizations that work through crisis communications planning in advance make faster, more accurate decisions in the first hour — because the structure is already there when the situation is not.
Frequently asked questions
Can a holding statement be posted on social media?
Yes — and it should be. Social platforms are where many stories take shape first. Post the same approved text across your active channels simultaneously with any media distribution. Do not modify the language for each platform; consistency is the point.
What if new information contradicts what we said in the holding statement?
Issue a correction immediately and without defensiveness. Acknowledge the update, state the corrected fact, and explain that your earlier statement reflected what was known at the time. Attempting to quietly revise a public statement without acknowledgment damages credibility far more than an honest correction.
How many holding statements should we issue before moving to a full briefing?
Issue holding statements only as long as you lack verified facts for a substantive update. Move to a fuller briefing as soon as you can confirm the facts, at the time your holding statement promised if you can. Issuing repeated identical holding statements with no new information signals stalling, not transparency.
Does a holding statement apply to internal crises, not just public incidents?
Absolutely. Employee-facing crises — workforce reductions, internal investigations, system failures — benefit from the same discipline: acknowledge, commit to a timeline, avoid speculation. The audience changes; the structure does not.
Sources
- National Incident Management System, Third Edition (October 2017), FEMA
- Public Information Officer Training Program, FEMA Emergency Management Institute
- IS-29.a: Public Information Officer Awareness, FEMA Emergency Management Institute


